<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Can Put a Man on the Moon - Yet Cannot Stop Kim Jong-Il?</title>
	<link>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/</link>
	<description>I Have Plenty of Opinions on World and News Events - Are You Ready?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: judyplantz</title>
		<link>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>judyplantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks dsent for your comment... I know I can always count on you for action.  

It is true what you say, this is why blogs exist... So My ideas and yours can inspire commentary and an alternate point of view.  North Korea playfully firing missiles at the U.S. with exceedingly increasing accuracy is indeed cause for great attention.  You and I cannot assume that it is okay, that is definitely not in national best interest is it?  What is the next source of weaponry to be tested?  Where is this going?  

I could understand something more innocent if there were some recent democratic works at hand and there were some points to be worked on - And there is another thing, why haven't there been any talks?  Right now if there aren't arrangements being made to negotiate with North Korea, war may by default become the only choice.  Kim Jong-Il has put the U.S. in a position where their safety is impinged upon, even if it isn't a great threatening force.   I understand that the U.S military is many times larger.  Bottom line I already illustrated.  No negotiations means yes war.  

Thanks for the comment.

And for Bob... I greatly appreciate the thought behind your comment, as with all.  I prefer to write my opinion exactly the way it unfolds as I watch the news.  I do not claim to be a great politician or anything similar.  I am a person, with feelings, and I feel.  

I like to write the full power of the thoughts out before I sand the corners off.  This because people such as yourself, dsent, and a handful of others love to correct those that they believe are stating mistruths or erroneous/naive ideologies.  To me this is the good stuff.  I have stated exactly as I feel/felt... two of you state juicy alternate opinions; you have thrown me a New York steak to sink my teeth into...  And the world keeps on turning, all is good.  

Thanks Bob!  ...Oh and Bob, of course I don't want to bomb all of those nice South Korean people... It would be ever so much more convenient though if they just &lt;em&gt;weren't in the way!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dsent for your comment&#8230; I know I can always count on you for action.  </p>
<p>It is true what you say, this is why blogs exist&#8230; So My ideas and yours can inspire commentary and an alternate point of view.  North Korea playfully firing missiles at the U.S. with exceedingly increasing accuracy is indeed cause for great attention.  You and I cannot assume that it is okay, that is definitely not in national best interest is it?  What is the next source of weaponry to be tested?  Where is this going?  </p>
<p>I could understand something more innocent if there were some recent democratic works at hand and there were some points to be worked on - And there is another thing, why haven&#8217;t there been any talks?  Right now if there aren&#8217;t arrangements being made to negotiate with North Korea, war may by default become the only choice.  Kim Jong-Il has put the U.S. in a position where their safety is impinged upon, even if it isn&#8217;t a great threatening force.   I understand that the U.S military is many times larger.  Bottom line I already illustrated.  No negotiations means yes war.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>And for Bob&#8230; I greatly appreciate the thought behind your comment, as with all.  I prefer to write my opinion exactly the way it unfolds as I watch the news.  I do not claim to be a great politician or anything similar.  I am a person, with feelings, and I feel.  </p>
<p>I like to write the full power of the thoughts out before I sand the corners off.  This because people such as yourself, dsent, and a handful of others love to correct those that they believe are stating mistruths or erroneous/naive ideologies.  To me this is the good stuff.  I have stated exactly as I feel/felt&#8230; two of you state juicy alternate opinions; you have thrown me a New York steak to sink my teeth into&#8230;  And the world keeps on turning, all is good.  </p>
<p>Thanks Bob!  &#8230;Oh and Bob, of course I don&#8217;t want to bomb all of those nice South Korean people&#8230; It would be ever so much more convenient though if they just <em>weren&#8217;t in the way!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Have you considered the ramnifications of a war with North Korea? It might not affect you (because you're sitting comfortably on a couch thousands of miles away from the action), but realise that millions of South Koreans live within artillery range. Even excluding NBC weapons, conventional artillery aimed at Seoul is enough to level the city within days.

So unless the US can invade, destroy and conquer North Korea within hours, any rash war will be dooming the lives of millions of South Koreans.

(By the way, South Korea is a democracy and allied to the US. So it's bad for South Koreans to die.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered the ramnifications of a war with North Korea? It might not affect you (because you&#8217;re sitting comfortably on a couch thousands of miles away from the action), but realise that millions of South Koreans live within artillery range. Even excluding NBC weapons, conventional artillery aimed at Seoul is enough to level the city within days.</p>
<p>So unless the US can invade, destroy and conquer North Korea within hours, any rash war will be dooming the lives of millions of South Koreans.</p>
<p>(By the way, South Korea is a democracy and allied to the US. So it&#8217;s bad for South Koreans to die.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsent</title>
		<link>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>dsent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judysayswhat.today.com/2009/07/05/we-can-put-a-man-on-the-moon-yet-cannot-stop-kim-jong-il/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Wow you seem really angry. N. Korea has not killed a fraction of the civilians the US military has, nor have they created a fraction of the refugees the US military has. And the dont have a fraction of the nuclear capibilities the US has. Whats got you so worked up about N. Korea? Do you live there? Is Kim Jong-Il repressing you? Is his great crime wanting nukes? N Korea is regularly threatened by the most powerful nation on earth, the US. They want nuclear weapons to defend themselves, big suprise. I just dont get it, US actions have created millions of refugees in Afghanistan, Iraq and have also killed countless tens of thousands of civilians. We cant clean up N Korea's back yard if we wont clean up our own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you seem really angry. N. Korea has not killed a fraction of the civilians the US military has, nor have they created a fraction of the refugees the US military has. And the dont have a fraction of the nuclear capibilities the US has. Whats got you so worked up about N. Korea? Do you live there? Is Kim Jong-Il repressing you? Is his great crime wanting nukes? N Korea is regularly threatened by the most powerful nation on earth, the US. They want nuclear weapons to defend themselves, big suprise. I just dont get it, US actions have created millions of refugees in Afghanistan, Iraq and have also killed countless tens of thousands of civilians. We cant clean up N Korea&#8217;s back yard if we wont clean up our own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


